An analysis of glaucoma repeat measures assessment results: Are core competencies enough?

PURPOSE: The need to validate core competency skills in qualified optometrists wishing to take part in extended roles in glaucoma care has been questioned. This analysis examines the ability of qualified optometrists to perform relevant core competency skills under standardised objective assessment conditions to explore whether such validation is justified. It also investigates if there are associations between performance, gender and length of time since qualification. METHODS: Anonymised data from the Cardiff University assessment programme for the Wales Optometry Postgraduate Education Centre (WOPEC) Local Optical Committee Support Unit glaucoma referral filtering and monitoring pathway delivered between January 2017 and March 2020 were analysed. Results were combined with demographic data from the General Optical Council register of optometrists in the UK to investigate associations between performance and practitioner characteristics, namely length of time since qualification and gender. RESULTS: The assessment results of 2215 optometrists practising in England (approximately 15% of all UK registered optometrists and 30% of all optometrists registered in England) were analysed. Failure rates for first time assessment in each of five objective structured clinical examination style practical assessments were 8.5% (van Herick); 8.8% (slit lamp binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy); 10.1% (Goldmann applanation tonometry calibration); 21.9% (Goldmann applanation tonometry) and 23.3% (case scenario interpretation and management). There were either no associations or at most very weak associations between performance and practitioner characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that these competencies are not universally present in optometrists practising in England and that ongoing training and assessment of these competencies is justified for entry into extended roles. There are no meaningful associations between performance in these assessments and gender or time since qualification.

Factors influencing the prescribing behaviour of independent prescriber optometrists: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

PURPOSE: Whilst the number of independent prescriber (IP) optometrists in the United Kingdom is increasing, there is limited evidence describing the experiences of these individuals. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) provides an evidence-based approach to understand determinants of behaviour. This conceptual framework can enable mapping to the COM-B behaviour change model and the wider Behaviour Change Wheel to develop interventions to optimise behaviour-change and healthcare processes more systematically. The study aimed to use the TDF to identify the factors that influence independent prescribing behaviour, and to map these findings to the COM-B system to elucidate the relevant intervention functions, in order to identify the support required by optometrist prescribers. METHODS: Using a qualitative design, semi-structured interviews based on the TDF were undertaken with independent prescriber optometrists. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes inductively, which were then deductively mapped to the TDF and linked to the COM-B. RESULTS: Sixteen participants (9 male, 7 female; median age 45 years, range 28-65 years), based in community (n = 10) and hospital (n = 6) settings, were interviewed. Eleven of the TDF domains were found to influence prescribing behaviour. Findings highlighted the need for good communication with patients (TDF domain: Skills, COM-B: Capability); confidence (TDF domain: Beliefs about capabilities, COM-B: Motivation); good networks and relationships with other healthcare professionals, e.g., general practitioners (TDF domain: Social influences, COM-B: Opportunity; TDF domain: Social/professional role and identity, COM-B: Motivation); the need for appropriate structure for remuneration (TDF domain: Reinforcement, COM-B: Motivation; TDF domain: Social/professional role and identity, COM-B: Motivation) and the provision of professional guidelines (TDF domain: Knowledge, COM-B: Capability; TDF domain: Environmental context and resources, COM-B Opportunity). CONCLUSIONS: Having identified theory-derived influencers on prescribing decisions by optometrists, the findings can be used to develop a structured intervention, such as a support package to help optimise prescribing by optometrists, with the ultimate goal of eye care quality improvement.

Binocular summation to gratings in the peripheral field in older subjects is spatial frequency dependent.

PURPOSE: Binocular summation for contrast detection in the fovea is lower in older normal subjects. At present, no binocular summation data exist for contrast detection in older subjects in the peripheral field. METHODS: Monocular and binocular contrast thresholds were measured for sine-wave gratings of 1 c/deg (F1) and 4 c/deg (F4) in the fovea in young and older visually normal subjects. Measurements were also obtained at 8 degrees in the superior field for gratings of 1 c/deg (P1) and 4 c/deg (P4). RESULTS: Binocular summation ratios in young subjects at the fovea and periphery were not statistically different at either spatial frequency. In older subjects, analysis of the relevant conditions showed significantly lower summation ratios for: P4/F4 combination (p = 0.05), and P4/P1 combination (p = 0.03). No significant differences existed for F1/P1 and F1/F4 combinations (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lowest binocular summation ratio is shown with older subjects for gratings of 4 c/deg in the periphery (P4). Further analysis suggests the possibility that this is due to a larger relative loss in binocular sensitivity. Data are discussed in terms of selective loss of binocular neurons mediating peripheral sensitivity in the ageing eye.